Morning on Monte Orlando
Morning on Monte Orlando
Photography \ Architecture | 02/28/04 @993 |
Nailati |
critiques (12) |
views (1071)
Do not copy, modify, distribute or sell the whole or parts of the image above without permission of the creator. More.
Description
Year: 2000Media: Pentax IQZoom, PS 7
Lazio, Italy. Abandoned building on Monte Orlando in Gaeta.
Comments and critiques welcome.
Vote statisticsRecent: 0 votes, 0 pointsTotal: 16 votes, 95 points |
Cast your voteYou have to be logged in to voteVoting? Read the faq |
OptionsNone |
Comments (12)
Comment
To write a comment you need to be logged in
If you're not a registered member, click here to sign up.Reviews (0) beta
Write a review
To write a review you need to be logged in
If you're not a registered member, click here to sign up.Search the site
Found a rip-off? Report it!
Copyright © 2000-2008 All rights reserved
Read the Terms of use and Privacy Statement.
This site is a property of Brothers in art For more information and support, contact .
Copyright © 2000-2008 All rights reserved
This site is a property of Brothers in art For more information and support, contact .



02/29/04 @010
02/29/04 @121
02/29/04 @221
02/29/04 @254
02/29/04 @270
Since it's good basic for interesting photo-manipulation, I recommend to darker sky a lot - practically you should turn it into dark using brush with black color, because you can catch similar light conditions only in caves.
I will be monitoring your portfolio, perhaps one day you will realise it. Oh, one more thing, ThruMyEyez is right
02/29/04 @316
Here is the original: scanned at 1000 dpi, resized for the web, and otherwise untouched.
As Byonder said, this is an actual lens flare. I did a lot of walking back and forth to get the light to hit the camera like this.
Also, you're both right that it appears crooked, but to be honest that's because the building was crooked—if you look at the ground, it's parallel to the bottom of the picture.
I appreciate your comment, but if it was a manip, I would put it in manips.
[Edit: Apology accepted
02/29/04 @536
02/29/04 @642
02/29/04 @682
02/29/04 @811
03/04/04 @583
04/05/05 @473
Flowjoe